Tuesday, November 5, 2013

[Lesson Plan] Carousel Discussion: "The Taming of the Shrew" Act 5

My students are winding down our unit on The Taming of the Shrew. Today students participated in a Carousel Discussion. Here's how I presented the lesson to students:

Teacher Preparation:

Before students arrive for the discussion, teachers must prepare the materials. I first acquire five pieces of butcher paper on which I attached the materials I gave to students the previous day. Carousel Chart Labels are enlarged to enable easy use by students,  and the student handout *Act 5, Carousel Discussion. This gives students the opportunity to look over the ideas they will discuss in the activity. 
Prior to their arrival, I hung the posters/charts around the room, making sure to leave enough room for groups to gather and share the space. It's important not to give students a reason to avoid participating.

Student Instructions:

When students arrive, they see the posters and know something is up. After they have been seated, I direct their attention to the posters/charts and tell them they'll participate in a carousel discussion. 

I define Carousel Discussion: 

Carousel Discussion  (also known as Rotating Review) scaffolds both  new concepts and/or information for review through movement, conversation, and reflection from one station to the next in a circular pattern, similar to the rotation of a carousel. It  is a cooperative learning activity that allows students  to discover and discuss ideas and themes in a literary work, such as The Taming of the Shrew. This technique allows for small group discussion, followed by whole-class reflection.

While taking part in Carousel Discussion, small groups of students rotate around the classroom, stopping at various “stations” for a designated period of time (in this case, 5-6 minutes).  At each station, students demonstrate their  knowledge of a topic or concept and share their ideas with their small group and with other groups who have already visited the station.  Each student  posts his/her ideas at each station for all groups to read. In turn, students may respond to the contributions made by those who have already rotated through the station.

After all students visit each station, the class reconvenes for a whole-class discussion and to report on each topic. 

I remind students that they have already seen the topics they'll be discussing, that they may use their scripts, that they need to use parenthetical citations in their responses, and that they need specific references to the text to support their ideas and opinions. 

Finally, I instruct students to initial their responses as these will be the basis for their grades. 
I tell students I'll evaluate their posts based on the following criteria:

  • Accuracy of information.
  • Specificity of textual references.
  • Response to the given topic.
  • Interactions with other comments. 
  • Ability to support their ideas via close reading. 
Conducting the Discussion:

Students report to their stations, which are all numbered. 

I set the timer and remind students not to talk. I put 6 minutes on the timer for the first round and allow one minute for rotating to the next station.

Between rounds, I tell students to circulate clockwise with those who were at #1 going to #2, those at #2 going to #3, those at #3 going to #4, those at #4 going to # 5, and those at #5 going to #1.

We continue through the rotation five times until each student has had a chance to respond to each post. During rotation, I respond to questions and remind students that discussion means interacting with what others have written. 

The students circulate and remain quiet during the lesson. Many use their texts to look for supporting material. One student returned to a previous chart, when she had time remaining from the next one, so she could modify her response. 

Since students had notes to which they could refer, the use of their texts, and the discussion items prior to the discussion, they remained on task throughout the activity and at times commented that they had more to say on a given topic.

The Animoto highlights students working on the discussion as well as their finished Carousel Discussion charts ready for reporting. 


Reporting from the Groups:

We used the last part of class to report back and to clarify ideas. For example, during student reports, I was able to point out where students needed additional information to make their arguments. I did this by posing questions. For example, when one group reported that Petruchio was polite to Katherine at first but became rude later, I was able to ask them why he behaves this way. "Is Petruchio being deceptive or is something else going on?" 

That same group reported that Petruchio's kissing Kate at the end and going off to bed is a form of deception. This allowed me to ask why they label the ending deceptive. That resulted in a student saying she didn't understand the question because she didn't know the term deception. 

This admission was quite revealing because we have talked about pretending, deceiving, tricking characters throughout, and without an understanding of the term, the student cannot get to the heart of the play. 

Consequently, I was able to remind students that knowing the words leads to understanding and that they need to help me realize when we need to spend more time talking terms. 

The discussion also exposed gaps in student knowledge when students struggled with analyzing the relationship between Bianca and Kate.I learned that we need more time talking about whether or not Bianca is jealous of Kate and/or vice versa. I also learned that we need to revisit the scene in which Baptista and others compare Kate to Bianca. 

Since each group reported on the totality of each chart, these discussions were much safer than a whole-class-discussion that might leave a student feeling embarrassed or silent from fear of being wrong. 

NCTE 2013: Are you attending? If so, I hope to see you there and invite you to attend my session.

 "Lend Me Your [H]ear: Envisioning Listening in 21st Century Classrooms" 
Session K:08 
Sheraton, Sheraton/Beacon G Room, 3rd Floor 
Saturday, November 23, 2013, 4:15-5:30 p.m.


*Special thanks to Dana Huff for including this resource on her The Taming of the Shrew Wiki.

**This lesson plan is one I constructed for the Better Lesson NEA Master Teacher Project; it will be part of a complete unit on The Taming of the Shrew and will be in a much more detailed format on the BL site at a later date. Additionally, the unit is part of the senior English course I am creating for the BL NEA MTP this school year. The project will ultimately include every lesson I teach this year and will include resources, student work samples, a video component, a reflection, and several layers of tagging. I never design lessons for the purpose of preparing students to take high stakes tests.

No comments:

Post a Comment